I absolutely, vehemently, unequivocally detest when my rights and freedoms are infringed upon for any reason, but most especially because of an (usually unfounded) assumption someone makes about me.
I’ve ranted previously about pre-paying at the gas pump because it’s assumed that I’m a thief. I’m moving up the scale of judgment and stupidity a bit here. The other night I went shopping at the local Wal-Frickin’ with the missus. We got some groceries for The Boy’s birthday celebration, a few party supplies (paper plates, napkins, gift bags for the schwag, etc.) and a set of 4 wooden TV trays. After we’d checked out, as we were heading towards the exit, the greeter (who looked for all the world like a bored high school kid, resting her lethargic and terminally bored face onto the palm of her hand as she leaned on the desk in front of her and presumably tried not to drool or fall asleep or both) asked to see my receipt.
Now I’m no dummy. I know my rights and I’m pretty aware of privacy laws in the state of Utah.
“What do you need that for?” I responded.
You see, I know that I’m perfectly within my legal rights to dismiss her with a “no thanks” and continue walking to my car. I also know that it’s Wally-World’s policy to check receipts on electronics and large items, even though they have no legal standing to do so. I’ve read plenty of horror stories of people being detained and even having the police called because they refused to allow a Wal-Mart employee to check their receipt.
“Because you’ve got a large item – that table-thing there” she said, pointing to the cart. “We check all the receipts on stuff like that” she continued, as if that made everything ok.
It was late, and I was tired and ready to be home, so I opted to just let her check the receipt rather than risking the inevitable ruckus that would have followed my refusal. She checked the receipt and I was on my way.
Is having a Wal-Mart greeter, being of either the iconic octogenarian or self-important adolescent variety, check my receipt really that big of a deal? I guess it depends on how strongly you feel about your individual privacy and rights.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a privacy zealot or anything, I just feel that one of the basic tenets of our great nation and one of our most valuable freedoms is our individual rights.
Let me switch gears for a minute here, and I invite you to ask yourself if you feel the same way in just a moment, and perhaps more importantly, why or why not.
On December 25, 2009, 23-year-old Nigerian, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted to detonate and explosive device on a Delta/Northwest flight from Amsterdam, The Netherlands, to Detroit, Michigan. He failed, and is currently in custody, but his actions prompted a massive jump in airline security measures and an outcry from the media and political institutions for greater measures in screening airline passengers. One of the proposed measures is the x-ray-like “full-body scan” (image below). Now, it’s not that I take issue with somebody checking out my junk. You wanna see it? I got no problem with that. What I take issue with is the fact that because one man did something stupid, everyone immediately feels like stricter measures are needed, and by and large, people are willing to simply hand over the freedoms that hundreds of thousands of men and women have fought and died for.
click for larger image
Let me just put this in perspective. It’s estimated that approximately 730 million people travelled on commercial airlines in 2008. Assuming that statistic holds (more or less) true for 2009, we can safely say that there’s a 1 in 730,000,000 chance that a terrorist will end up on a plane and try to do something bad.
By comparison, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, there were 13, 846 alcohol-related deaths in 2008. The estimated US population that year was 304,059,724. Now, not taking into account that only a certain percentage of that number is licensed drivers of legal age, and using the whole raw number, that’s 1 in 21,960.
Funny, but I don’t hear anyone screaming as loudly or ardently about drunk drivers as I do about some guy that burned his johnson off trying to blow up a plane.
If you want to really put this in perspective, a law requiring a full-body scan prior to boarding a plane (presumably in the interest of making the flight safer), is pretty much the same thing as requiring every vehicle in America to be equipped with a BAC device that would prevent the vehicle from starting pending a ‘pass’ result with an acceptable blood-alcohol rating.
Never had a drink in your life? Doesn’t matter. Everyone gets screened equally when it comes to airlines, and if this is such an acceptable exchange of risk versus rights, why would the same not hold true with vehicles? After all, the numbers just don’t lie. Approximately 3,500 people died on 9/11 – the worst aviation disaster of all time by a long shot – which is only about 25% of the number of drunk driving deaths annually.
And yet, because of media fear-mongering and our innate need to feel “safe” (whether it’s an illusion or not doesn’t matter), we’re willing to simply hand over our freedoms, no questions asked.
I imagine the men and women who have died protecting those freedoms would take issue with that.
Jason Chaffetz is a damn moron.

